PFDebate

March 2010 Topic Announced

by PFDebate LLC on February 1, 2010

Resolved: Affir­ma­tive action to pro­mote equal oppor­tu­nity in the United States is justified.

{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }

Snarf February 1, 2010 at 9:19 am

Are you KIDDING ME

PFDebate LLC February 1, 2010 at 9:23 am

Snarf, are you hav­ing sec­ond thoughts about the NFL sell­ing off the Pub­lic Forum Debate topics?

a PF debater February 1, 2010 at 10:41 am

what is this? LD??

Quinn February 1, 2010 at 12:41 pm

uhh­h­h­h­h­hhh

Closeout Files February 1, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Very sur­pris­ing that they picked Affir­ma­tive Action for the topic. “Jus­ti­fied” is a key word in this topic for sure, and, because of it, I think it makes the topic more balanced.

I don't get it February 1, 2010 at 5:32 pm

LD much? They don’t sell the nation­als topic, do they?

Blake February 1, 2010 at 5:51 pm

“Jus­ti­fied”

Really? This looks like an LD topic.

Ross February 1, 2010 at 9:37 pm

is this a joke…?

Blake K. February 1, 2010 at 10:06 pm

this is ridicu­lous. the res­o­lu­tion is so one-sided. good luck any­one who loses a coin toss and ends up on the neg.

Ross February 1, 2010 at 10:27 pm

i agree with blake…if ur neg…well…merde!

Emily February 1, 2010 at 11:11 pm

I wish they had left out the “to pro­mote equal oppor­tu­nity” part out of the res­o­lu­tion. Even though it prob­a­bly would have sounded even more “LD”, it would have bal­anced out the res­o­lu­tion in my opinion.

Tyler T. February 1, 2010 at 11:38 pm

This is the topic for dis­tricts for us. I feel so roy­ally effed, because I will undoubt­edly flip neg almost every round.

This is so stu­pid. Does this not just scream LD topic?

PFD February 1, 2010 at 11:47 pm

I don’t think it’s that one-sided; how­ever, that does not make it a good PF topic. I am inclined to agree with Jonathan Peele more than ever. Stop sell­ing our top­ics. Send stuff like this back to LD.

accomplice February 2, 2010 at 1:02 am

neg hint:

JUSTIFIED

what exactly is the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for affir­ma­tive action?

does that make any sense at all?

Snarf February 2, 2010 at 2:45 pm

Dear Mr. Bob Jordan,

I have suc­cess­fully eaten my words. Sell­ing of top­ics sucks.

Thank you,

Snarf

Emery February 2, 2010 at 2:54 pm

Stop com­plain­ing about the topic being LDesque, get creative!

meh February 2, 2010 at 3:29 pm

I won­der how much it would cost to buy a good topic from the NFL. Maybe we should start a collection.

Zach February 2, 2010 at 6:25 pm

This.Is.Lame.

PF debater February 2, 2010 at 6:43 pm

Could you please post the index for the Feb­ru­ary cross­fire brief as a free download.

Snarf February 2, 2010 at 9:33 pm

Meh left a funny com­ment. Good job, meh.

Snarf February 3, 2010 at 9:25 am

March 2003
Resolved: Affir­ma­tive action should not be prac­ticed in col­lege and uni­ver­sity admission.

Well that’s just dandy. This is a topic that came up before we CAME UP WITH A COMMISSION TO NOT PICK STUPID TOPICS.

Leave a Comment

Copyright © 2009 PFDebate LLC