Comments on: The Case For Reading Author Qualifications http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/ Public Forum Debate News & Information Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:32:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Discussions in the Debate Community — PFDebate Blog http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19737 Discussions in the Debate Community — PFDebate Blog Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:53:45 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19737 [...] Second, The 3NR has a follow-up on the discussion about reading author qualifications aloud which we mentioned previously. [...] […] Second, The 3NR has a follow-up on the discussion about reading author qualifications aloud which we mentioned previously. […]

]]> By: Czar http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19644 Czar Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:55:05 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19644 We ought to be able to just say the name and date like TD....Speeches are too short and if someone wants the full citation they can ask for in in Crossfire for clarification purposes We ought to be able to just say the name and date like TD.…Speeches are too short and if someone wants the full citation they can ask for in in Crossfire for clarification purposes

]]> By: Quinn http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19642 Quinn Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:17:44 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19642 p.s. Did anybody watch nationals but me? Nobody read any "Title of the Source" =P So much for NFL rules. p.s. Did anybody watch nationals but me? Nobody read any “Title of the Source” =P So much for NFL rules.

]]> By: Quinn http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19641 Quinn Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:58:23 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19641 "In all rounds, debaters should, at a minimum, orally deliver title of the source and the author’s name." - National Football League ... So why is it necessary to orally deliver the authors quals....? “In all rounds, debaters should, at a minimum, orally deliver title of the source and the author’s name.” — National Football League … So why is it necessary to orally deliver the authors quals.…?

]]> By: Aaron Walker http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19639 Aaron Walker Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:08:40 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19639 Qualifications are nessesary. Not only that but the NFL mandates that we have author qualification in our evidence cause if they didnt then I could quote my best friend and it be considered ligit. However, I do agree that when people only argue the year on evidence then I get aggrevated. Qualifications are nessesary. Not only that but the NFL mandates that we have author qualification in our evidence cause if they didnt then I could quote my best friend and it be considered ligit. However, I do agree that when people only argue the year on evidence then I get aggrevated.

]]> By: Quinn http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19636 Quinn Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:13:39 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19636 We don't read author quals, if they want them they can get them in crossfire. We don’t read author quals, if they want them they can get them in crossfire.

]]> By: Christian Chessman http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19635 Christian Chessman Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:07:04 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19635 I think rman trolls pretending to be the worst of cx debate. No, I don't think he's serious. Any legit cx debater knows that author quals are an integral part of debate in some cases. I think rman trolls pretending to be the worst of cx debate. No, I don’t think he’s serious. Any legit cx debater knows that author quals are an integral part of debate in some cases.

]]> By: Aditya Gulanikar http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19634 Aditya Gulanikar Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:18:46 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19634 R-Man, Are you being serious? R-Man,

Are you being serious?

]]> By: R-Man http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19630 R-Man Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:48:57 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19630 author qualifications are the biggest waste of time....and completely unnecessary....evidence should have nothing to do with the decision...otherwise morons could debate just by having evidence and researching...it allows talentless ppl to do well which is unacceptable. author qualifications are the biggest waste of time.…and completely unnecessary.…evidence should have nothing to do with the decision…otherwise morons could debate just by having evidence and researching…it allows talentless ppl to do well which is unacceptable.

]]> By: PFDebate LLC http://blog.pfdebate.com/2009/06/04/the-case-for-reading-author-qualifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19629 PFDebate LLC Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:50:34 +0000 http://blog.pfdebate.com/?p=2145#comment-19629 As debaters push the norms of Public Forum Debate, there will be a temptation to drop source qualifications, especially because of the short speech times. I'm certain that citation standards already vary considerably around the nation. Heck, evidence citation quality varies considerably between handbooks. As debaters push the norms of Public Forum Debate, there will be a temptation to drop source qualifications, especially because of the short speech times. I’m certain that citation standards already vary considerably around the nation. Heck, evidence citation quality varies considerably between handbooks.

]]>