Only if people let it turn into an LD debate. Don’t use standards/weird-ass definitions and it won’t suck. Just argue it straight up–ought a society afford people a positive right to health care? It doesn’t matter what sort of society, it’s more just–positive right to health care: thumbs up or thumbs down? Chances are it will be bad because people are going to make it into LD, but I would just suggest don’t do so, and judges will appreciate it
Crossfire Briefs are published 10 times per year for the September through April NFL topics, the NCFL Grand Nationals topic, and the NFL Nationals topic.
For more information about Crossfire Briefs, visit the PFDebate Shop
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Bit LDish much?
Only if people let it turn into an LD debate. Don’t use standards/weird-ass definitions and it won’t suck. Just argue it straight up–ought a society afford people a positive right to health care? It doesn’t matter what sort of society, it’s more just–positive right to health care: thumbs up or thumbs down? Chances are it will be bad because people are going to make it into LD, but I would just suggest don’t do so, and judges will appreciate it
this is why NCFL sux so much…and why its so illegit.
YES! Ultimate WIN TOPIC!!!